|
A missing CORCFG in a VISTA environment should not be tolerated. Currently when CORCFG is missing the job produces "+COR005E Runtime configuration module CORCFG not located" message but it continues processing which could result in huge logical corruption because of the missing partition table and hence missing data. Software AG explained that with other software that uses Coordinator (e.g. Fastpath), a missing CORCFG should be tolerated. However, I strongly believe in VISTA it carries a huge risk if tolerated. Perhaps an option of “COR=FORCE” in LGBLSET (with the necessary code to stop the execution if CORCFG cannot be loaded), can solve the problem ?