I demand an enhancement for the
ADAFRM utility.
Trying to increase the space for
DATA container (new container DATAR2), we got a crash in our production system
executing:
DDDATAR2 ....DSN=xxx.datar2
with
ADAFRM DATAFRM SIZE=XXXX
Without specifying NUMBER
keyword.
In so way, ADAFRM failed with
ERROR-34. We thought, by error, it might be declared DATAR1 container.
Then, ADAFRM started successfully
with:
DDDATAR1 ....DSN=xxx.datar1
DDDATAR2 ....DSN=xxx.datar2
but we were formatting DATAR1,
leading to crash.
It would be a good idea to change
the manage of NUMBER keyword in order not to have a default. This keyword might
be compulsory.
So, one would be able to know
what container is being formatting.
