|
|
The written Report outputs from REVIEW can be very long and unstructured when the concerned nucleus is up for some month. Different reports are written without special header after the previous report. It needs much time to separate these reports. It would be very helpful if each report has an header containing DBID and LPAR-name for a much better handling of these outputs.
| Use Case | Review |
| Created on Brainstorm | 05.09.2018 03:18 pm |
| Brainstorm ID | 5912 |
Hi Christoph,
RnD is asking for a more precise definition of what is positive/negative:
"Can you please send us the Report Definition as defined in the Edit Report and a current output. Please use copy and paste of the text, not a hardcopy of the picture. Then modify manually another copy of the output according to your needs."
So we need both, the negative example and the positive one.
Both as text files please.
We cannot guarantee any schedule, though. But we need to start with the understanding of this idea.
Thanks so much in advance.
Cheers,
Jürgen