|
|
Understanding Natural & Adabas documentation faster - The tool is effective in identifying technical issues such as syntax errors. For syntax-related issues, it not only detects the problem but also provides relevant references (e.g., Software AG documentation), which is helpful for deeper understanding. It offers useful suggestions for improving exception handling and overall code robustness. The response time is fast, enabling quick analysis and iteration.
Generating code snippets - Generated Natural Program instead of JCL sample. It has limited context as Web based version requires file to be uploaded, to understand the context, to generate code. Integration with a compiler is a strong differentiator compared to tools like Copilot, as it enables more accurate issue detection and actionable code fixes or recommendations.
Explaining existing code - Yes but in pure technical language. When provided with multiple related components (e.g., 5–6 components of a single function), it delivers a coherent and meaningful summary..
Debugging or refactoring Natural programs - The current chat-only interaction model is a key limitation. Integrating the tool directly with the codebase would significantly enhance its effectiveness. With deeper codebase access, it could provide more contextual and accurate insights, making it comparable to platforms like NaturalONE or Copilot.
Generating test cases or validations - Web based version doesn't have this feature where as GitHub Copilot integrated with Natural is able to produce Unit Test cases.
