Skip to Main Content
Due to the recent acquisition by IBM, the Adabas & Natural Ideas Portal does not contain ideas from products ApplinX and EntireX any longer. Please refer to the IBM Ideas Portal for these products from now on (IBMid required). Existing content will be migrated during the next few weeks.
Status Released
Workspace Natural for z/OS
Created by Jay Baucher
Created on Apr 21, 2022

Natural should be able to detect the problem with having the MF value and the static generation value different

Natural should be able to detect the problem with having the MF value and the static generation value different and either

1. automatically adjust in some fashion

2. at least, give a message that identifies the problem,

so we don't have to spend 2 months trying different things to identify the problem

  • Admin
    Eli Cohen
    Reply
    |
    Sep 21, 2022

    Many thanks for this request, It have been delivered via FIX.

  • Dana Sherbondy
    Reply
    |
    May 4, 2022

    https://getsupport.softwareag.com/browse/SI-460535

    related incident and linked channel and itrac are in the ticket.


  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 25, 2022

    We do have an incident - SI-460535 NAT3700 after upgrading

    The DB2 MF>0 was put into the Development regions with a prior upgrade, but it didn���t make it into the production build. Apparently, in development, they didn���t prepare programs for static execution, so no issues were reported. When we upgraded Production from Nat911 to Nat912, we also picked up the DB2 MF>0, and production programs started failing, so the upgrade had to be backed out. It took 2 months of experimenting in development to recreate the issue and determine that it was related to DB2 MF>0.

    Thanks,
    Jay Baucher
    Technology Consultant, MF Database Management System Support
    DXC Technology

    T +1.470.754.9174
    M +1.419.422.7578
    Jay.Baucher@dxc.com

    DXC.COM
    [cid:image001.png@01D85885.22591DF0]

  • Admin
    Eli Cohen
    Reply
    |
    Apr 24, 2022

    Hello Jay, thank you for submitting this idea.

    We will need some more information about your idea so we can validate it.

    Did you already have an incident on this idea? if yes, could you please share the incident number?

    When did you find the missing information? Is it during the binding process?

    Any additional information would be helpful.